On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:37:56AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > IMHO, with not very convincing arguments. And no sign of answer about > the real potential problem: would that be another trademark issue. > Whatever solution is taken in the other branches of this thread where > possible UA strings are discussed, I think we should at some point > check with Mozilla Corporation about their stance: would they consider > it to be a trademark violation if we mention "Firefox" in some way in > the UA string of Iceweasel? I strongly disagree that we should do this, because it's *not* a trademark violation, so any opinion they might hold to the contrary is not relevant. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature