On mer, 2009-10-07 at 14:12 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > I expect that the kernel team tends to be more careful about uploads to > Unstable than most package maintainers due to the scope of damage that a bad > kernel can cause. But would it be possible to have an upload of a newer > kernel for people who want to test btrfs? I'm assuming that every system > that runs btrfs is at risk of losing all it's data anyway so running an > experimental kernel isn't going to make things any riskier. Is 2.6.31 enoiugh? corsac@hidalgo: apt-cache search linux-image-2.6.31 linux-headers-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 - Header files for Linux 2.6.31-trunk-amd64 linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 - Linux 2.6.31 image on AMD64 corsac@hidalgo: apt-cache madison linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64 | 2.6.31-1~experimental.1 | http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/main Packages linux-2.6 | 2.6.31-1~experimental.1 | http://ftp.fr.debian.org experimental/main Sources Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part