On mar., 2009-11-17 at 14:07 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Although it sounds a bit sillogical, if for some architectures we do not build > the packages that have no users, no user will complain. So why not ? Well, I'm not really sure we can expect our user to follow unstable and each and every FTBFS on their arch. I think quite a lot of people just happily use stable releases, and have little to no interaction with build system and BTS (because, you know, things do work fine, mostly, so you don't have anything to report). They day you want to upgrade to the next version you read the release notes and you see a huge list of package which aren't available on one or another arch, but it's too late. Unless your proposal is just for unstable but doesn't want to change the policy for testing migration? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part