hiya, On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:49:54AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > with respect to those that don't, it's been previously discussed and > > deemed okay for them not to work out of the box, which is a relatively > > small cost for the benefit of FHS compliance and general safety/sanity. > > OK on those without Alias, but how about whose that do have Alias-es? Do > you have a list of them and which file ship? Do you have some kind of > intermediate level where the maintainer can specify the Alias only once > and have it "compiled" to all web server configurations? nope, but i assume if there are folks who feel this itch it will get scratched :) this type of information would be really good to have in footnotes or an appendix in the webapps policy or some other best practices document. > you have a list of them and which file ship? Do you have some kind of > intermediate level where the maintainer can specify the Alias only once > and have it "compiled" to all web server configurations? i think that was the original intention of webapps-common, but once again i should point out that this project hasn't gone anywhere in a year or two, mostly due to lack of interest/time. sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature