Re: Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold
On 2009-11-02, Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
>> important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
>> binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
>> your executables.
> Since this obviously breaks lots of packages, what about changing the
> default in binutils-gold instead?
Binutils-gold is not the default. It is a bit 'stricter' in how it
works, but it is notably faster.