Hi, On Sonntag, 1. November 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > I think it's a very positive step forward for the archive as a > whole to start doing auto-rejects for some major Lintian tags, I only agree partially. IMO auto-rejects for _introducing_ certain lintian tags (in sid/exp) is right as it is also for _keeping_ certian lintian tags - but those (lists of tags) should not neccessarily be the same (lists). Doing a munin upload following FHS for /var/www doesnt help, but rather harms, if the upgrade path is sloopy. And yet, some FHS violations just seem to be treated as important (#523920), while others are more than serious (not being able to upload with some FHS violations, which IMO have less consequences...) /var/www is a quite cosmetic issue while #523920 actually harms functionality... bla, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.