Frans Pop schrieb: > Paul Wise wrote: >> I personally prefer not to be CCed on bug reports. I don't want to >> recieve any mail about a bug unless it is asking me to supply more >> information. > > So you *do* want to be CCed if the maintainer needs more information. > > Then there's one thing I don't get. > - if we change the default to "always CC", nobody is going to explicitly > CC submitters anymore; that's only logical, correct? > - you choose not to subscribe > - ergo, you will never see any requests for additional information > > How would you solve that problem within your proposal? I'm seeing exactly this problem with the proposal. IMHO we really need a way to definitely get the submitter and we need to use that whenever we need a answer. subscribing the submitter to ??????@bugs.d.o by default and giving the option to unsubscribe will just increase the number of Maintainers not thinking of CC the submitter. I don't care if we have -submitter to reach the submitter or -nosubmitter or whatever to keep him of the loop but a way to maybe reach the submitter and depending on that is really worse than what we have now. Regards Christoph -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0x0372275D \ / Campaign : GPG 4096R : 0xD49AE731 X against HTML : Debian NM / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature