Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:52:28AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:28:30AM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > The only difference with the unstable version is that libc-bin and
> > > libc-dev-bin are splitted out of libc6 and libc6-dev. This way it
> > > complies with the Debian Policy requirement that the libraries should
> > > not contain binaries, which is also a requirement for multiarch.
> > I just tried to upgrade libc6 with experimental. The upgrade has been
> > smooth but libc-dev-bin has not been pulled in (whereas libc6-dev has been
> > upgraded). Is it the expected behavior ?
> Thanks for noticing that. It's not normal that libc-dev-bin is not
> pulled, but if you look at the dependencies it actually normal.
> I'll try to understand why the dependency is declared in the
> debian/control file, but does not appear is in the final binary. Stay
I have just found, the problem, it will be fixed in the next upload.
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73