On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Michael Biebl] > > Would it make sense to avoid the upload of "obviously" broken > > packages from buildds in the future. E.g. if lintian detects an > > error it would need some special inspection from the buildd uploader. > > Don't all buildd binary packages already need "special inspection" from > a buildd uploader? I get somewhere between 30 and 100 mails success mails from my two buildds (voltaire and malo) on an average day. I do have a few mutt rules that highlight mails with obvious issues (so I can more closely inspect them before signing), but I seriously do *not* read all of them from start to end. I wouldn't be able to get any work done in that case. -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature