also sprach Peter Eisentraut <petere@debian.org> [2009.05.09.1142 +0200]:
> There are really two orthogonal things being discussed here: One question is
> whether the default MTA should be a full or proper implementation versus a
> tiny and limited implementation (or -- the latest idea -- none at all). The
> other is whether, if the full implementation is chosen, it should be Exim or
> Postfix. It might lead this argument to a clearer conclusion if those two
> issues are treated separately.
There's a third, issue, which is #508644: to abstract default-mta
(or similar), to make any such transition feasible in a future-proof
way.
Maybe we ought to concentrate on that first?
I think I am to blame a bit for adding to the fuel of the
postfix-exim4 debate with the doodle link, which just took us away
from the actual discussion. Sorry.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"although occasionally there is something to be said for solitude."
-- special agent dale cooper
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)