On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:23:33 +0200 Frank Lin PIAT <fpiat@klabs.be> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Hi > > > > Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:15 +0100 > > Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> napsal(a): > > > * The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header, meaning that > > > by default my email client wants to send replies to individual > > > posters. To get the mailing list included in the reply means that > > > I have to reply to all. It's a very easy mistake to make, not to > > > remember to manually shuffle these addresses around each time I > > > want to send a follow up. Don't make me think! > > > > See http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttLists, part Lists' "technical". (Most > > email clients do have this feature, Mutt was chosen because of > > User-Agent field in your email.) > > This thread will come over again and again until: > > 1. Debian stops getting new contributors (that haven't configured > their MUA properly "yet") > 2. Debian mailing-list sends appropriate "hints" so MUAs behave in > conformance with the m-l policy. > 3. Debian mailing-lists' policy is changes. > 4. The following MUA are fixed to behave "properly" when a user > press "reply": > > grep -hE '^(User-Agent:|X-Mailer)' lists/* | sed -e 's/^[^:]*:\s*//' > \ | sed -e 's,[ /].*,,' -e 's,(.*,,' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n -k 1 > 343 Claws > 329 Sylpheed Claws usually does this correctly, I think the exception is when the direct reply is the one you respond to. > > /me uses Debian's default MUA > /me tries hard to avoid CC'ing sender. > /me sometimes fails to remove CC'd people. /me had to use 'L' on Debians default MUA for the reply-to-list. kk > > Regards, > > Franklin -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian user / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature