On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:36:07AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> # in debian/rules
> -include /etc/buildpackage.mk
It seems to me that you are indeed close, but with the exception of
this required include in all our debian/rules, which will be a PITA to
achieve. AFAIU Raphael's proposal, the site-specific configuration
will be achieved via dpkg-buildpackage config's file, without needing
to include anything explicitly in debian/rules, while you are
insisting in the explicit include.
While I understand (though I disagree) with your reasons for having
that include, that looks like a major differences in the two positions
still.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature