On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:24:22 +0100 David Paleino wrote: > > > [.. regarding libx86 ..] > > May I throw in the fact that one sometimes wants x86emu on i386? Yes, I *do* remember your bugreport about it ;) (apropos: sorry if I didn't even reply to it, it just fell off my TODO...) > e.g. v86d works for me when built with x86emu, but not with lrmi, dunno who > to blame though (libx86 built for x86emu is okay too). Maybe v86d is to blame? IMVHO it's *weird* emulating x86 on an x86 arch... anyhow, I'll have a look next weekend (don't have many chances to do Debian-work during the week). David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature