Re: lrmi vs new kernels vs libx86
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:24:22 +0100 David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:19:47 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:12:01 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > David Paleino <email@example.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >I'll start work on liblrmi (i.e. ITP, making it, buildtesting relevant
> > > >packages, [..]) if some interest is shown.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what the benefit would be over libx86?
> > IMVHO code bundling is *never* good.
> Or, since the code would only be bundled in *one* package, we could just skip
> this "issue" and do everything in libx86.
May I throw in the fact that one sometimes wants x86emu on i386? e.g.
v86d works for me when built with x86emu, but not with lrmi, dunno who
to blame though (libx86 built for x86emu is okay too).