Please don't break threads ;) On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:12:01 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> wrote: > > >I'll start work on liblrmi (i.e. ITP, making it, buildtesting relevant > >packages, [..]) if some interest is shown. > > I'm not sure what the benefit would be over libx86? IMVHO code bundling is *never* good. > liblrmi would leave you stuck with x86, whereas using libx86 means that much > of the code will also work on amd64. Ok, I goofed there :) Honestly, liblrmi0 would only be a dependency of libx86 on x86, while it would use x86emu on other arches. Other packages would then depend on libx86, stop. Am I totally wrong? Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature