Re: Transition: krb5 to drop Kerberos IV (libkrb53 restructuring)
>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
Steve> Actually, I was meaning to comment on this. Why would you
Steve> not simply point the shlibs at the component library
Steve> packages at this stage? The only side effect is that the
Steve> version of krb5 that includes the split library packages
Steve> has to migrate to testing before anything else depending on
Steve> these packages can reach testing, but that's not terribly
Steve> onerous given that krb5's own migration to testing won't be
Steve> tangled up with other packages - this is already a very
Steve> "soft" transition, and I don't see the need for extra work
Steve> on the shlibs handling.
That was the only reason. If it had worked easily it would have been
worth it.
At this point I'll just keep on top of the package and do everything I
can to let it migrate to testing quickly.
--Sam
Reply to: