Re: cgroup mount point
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <email@example.com> writes:
> The message you quoted is from Daniel Berrange, not me.
You're right. I should have read more carefully.
> Could you also tell your rationale for not agreeing with /?
The bar for adding new required entries to the root directory is now
very high. The facility being discussed is far too specific to need a
top-level entry, especially when better alternatives have already been
suggested that fit it into the existing, more meaningful, directories.
\ “The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. |
`\ The pessimist fears it is true.” —J. Robert Oppenheimer |