Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:23:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080105082353.GA19121@javifsp.no-ip.org>
Mail-followup-to: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org>

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>    clips-common

Fixed now, I'm going to upload a new version (6.24-2) making it arch: all

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#459268: ITP: libev -- high-performance event loop library modelled after libevent
Next by Date: wxWidgets2.4
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread