Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> writes:
>> Brendan O'Dea <bod@debian.org>
>> perl-base
>
> That's a false positive. Please also take a look at Pre-Depends. Or
> simply let off of this effort, the number of false positives is
> enormous.
The automated listings already use grep-ctrl also checking for Pre-Depends,
both actions reducing the number of false positives.
I'm posting again the links:
http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/should-be-arch-all.txt
http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/should-be-arch-all.by-maint.txt
As I already said on one of my messages I'll do further analysis, but
meanwhile there's a preview of the packages that will probably be listed
even after a deeper/better check.
>
> Marc
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Reply to: