Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
From: Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:24:07 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080107162407.785d843a@mic.sysgo.cz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] flgo05$l3r$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] flgqde$uqm$1@ger.gmane.org>

Hi

On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:58:24 -0600
Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> wrote:

> Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org>
>    libgammu3

Eh?

$ apt-cache show libgammu3 | grep ^Dep
Depends: libbluetooth2 (>= 3.0), libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libgammu-common (>=
1.17.0-1)

-- 
	Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

References:
- List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
- Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian-AI
Next by Date: Re: Bug#459403: libuuid1: missing depends on non-essential package passwd
Previous by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Next by thread: Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread