Re: NEW processing
Neil Williams wrote:
> d) fix as many other lintian errors as possible throughout the archive.
> (Quite a lot of lintian errors - some that I would consider quite
> serious - affect several hundred packages.)
Actually, that's on my list of proposed QA RGs for squeeze, and am willing to
work on it (together with the no bashisms one [not just whatever dash doesn't
support], and others). But lets talk about that when the cal for proposals is