[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEW processing

On Thu, Dec 04 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:

> Which is why the ftp team should not be taking it upon themselves to
> overrule other developers' assessments of which bugs are critical to
> fix unless those overrulings are grounded in a clear consensus.
> If you have doubts about the quality of your own packages, feel free
> to get more experienced developers to review them for you before you
> upload.  But don't put up obstacles to other developers getting work
> done by giving some other set of developers veto power based on
> external criteria that the project has never agreed to.

        Why are these paragraphs only relevant to the ftp team and
 the archive, and not the release team and the, umm, release?

But what can you do with it?  -- ubiquitous cry from Linux-user
partner. (Submitted by Andy Pearce, ajp@hpopd.pwd.hp.com)
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: