On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 00:20 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <email@example.com> wrote: > > > - You state that screenshot will be released under the same term of > > the screenshot-ed package, why so? It seems to me rather arbitrary > > and makes impossible to bundle all screenshot together on a media > > and distribute them under a consistent license. > > > > Suggestion: just name a license and stick to it. > > screenshots are derivative works (according to SPI legal counsel): > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2008/08/msg00016.html And yet reviewers don't ask for permission to make screenshots, but seem to be comfortable with assuming that this is fair use. Ben.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part