Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Could you please elaborate here? The DFSG does not require us to have or
> ship source code for non-program works, and if documentation is being
> rejected on the basis of a *source* requirement (as distinct from a
> licensing issue), then I think we have a problem.
Well, we ftpmasters and assistants routinely REJECT packages
containing binary components without source, eg. PDF documentation. We
base this policy on the DFSG as explained in
http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 which very clearly states
that documentation needs to comply with the DFSG.
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer *