Re: Bug reports of DFSG violations are tagged ???lenny-ignore????
Kalle Kivimaa <email@example.com> wrote:
> Would it be a good compromise between SCs #1, #3 and #4 if we made an
> exhaustive list of non-free bits in main, and make it our goal that the
> list gets smaller between each release and not to add anything to
> that list?
The last part of the sentence is unrealistic, because the list would
only describe the *known*to*be* non-free bits. There are unknown
non-free bits already in the archive, and there might be some that
slip in by new upstream releases.
 Our up-upstream has recently started a license auditing and found
several, just look at texlive's most recent RC bugs
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg