Re: What you can do for "Lenny"
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 07:25, Luk Claes <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Is there any plan to fix things to allow separate uploads to testing and
>>> unstable for Lenny+1?
>> It's already existing, but we like packages to be tested *before* they
>> enter testing...
>> Much more aggressive removals from testing is of course another option...
> Ideally I would be able to upload a package for inclusion in Squeeze and a
> package for inclusion in Lenny on the same day.
> Once Lenny first gets frozen the ideal situation would be to allow
> unrestricted uploads of new versions for Squeeze. Then if a bug is found in
> both the version in Squeeze and the version in Lenny fixes could be uploaded
> for both at the same time.
> Do we need a testing-unstable place?
We do have experimental...