Re: packages up for adoption
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
>> so those are for him.
> Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption"?
If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and James deserves
an apology. On the other hand, once the package is up for adoption,
fixing 14 bugs seems like a relatively strong application for its
maintenance even if it's only by housekeeping and new upstream versions.
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/