Re: packages up for adoption
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> arthur loiret nmu uploaded latest upstream to experimental,
> >> so those are for him.
> > Where by "NMU" you mean "made an improper upload claiming to be the
> > maintainer of a package that was not up for adoption"?
> If he did not talk to James first, that is pretty bad and James deserves
> an apology. On the other hand, once the package is up for adoption,
> fixing 14 bugs seems like a relatively strong application for its
> maintenance even if it's only by housekeeping and new upstream versions.
right i should have uploaded to delayed.
arthur apologised to james afaij
he is right now 3 days on vac, but will be back soonest
and ready to take care of the gawk, gawk-doc, mawk packages.