On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:46:25 +0200 "Miriam Ruiz" <miriam@debian.org> wrote: > 2008/8/22 Daniel Dickinson <cshore@fionavar.ca>: > > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:39:29 -0700 > > Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: > > > >> > Is there any reason this isn't the default behaviour? > >> > >> It is the default. > >> > > > > Hmmm...I don't know how mine got to this state then. Probably did > > dpkg-reconfigure and forgot I had done so. > > > > Anyway it's cool that it's the default. > > I don't have the symlink to /etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf > in /etc/fonts/conf.d that you mention in my computer either, and I > didn't modify anything there myself. Are you sure it's the default? Did you say Yes instead of No to the bitmapped fonts question when fontconfig-config was upgraded? I don't know if I did or not (intentionally I mean. I don't remember if I just hit ENTER to accept defaults or if I (stupidly) changed it). It's one of those questions that one doesn't necessarily understand the consequences of, even after reading the message text. Or perhaps I hit ENTER but because it was Yes in previous versions of fontconfig, the Yes was the default instead of No (which is what I want, really). Regards, Daniel -- And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early, now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or strangle cute bunnies or something. -- Michael Devore GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C http://gnupg.org No more sea shells: Daniel's Weblog http://cshore.wordpress.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature