Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
Felipe Sateler <email@example.com> writes:
> I still don't understand why a SIGTERM is needed. If proper cleanup
> is not needed, why not just SIGKILL and be done with it? Is there a
> real reason?
My understanding only:
It is preferable for processes to clean up after themselves, which is
the semantic of SIGTERM. Only those processes which were not able to
do so in a timely manner will be abruptly killed with SIGKILL.
\ “Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.” (“Whatever is |
`\ said in Latin, sounds profound.”) —anonymous |