Re: Lenny frozen
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > OK, thanks.
> >
> > I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs
> > of severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for
> > the "important" ones) in order for inclusion in lenny, or also
> > lesser severities too ?
>
> As far as I can tell, unstable continues as normal. However, nothing
> that is uploaded to unstable as of the start of the freeze will be
> automatically migrated into testing.
If I understand correctly, uploading a new version to unstable
(targeting lenny+1), will prevent you from uploading a minor bug-fix'ed
version to unstable. This means that Lenny bug-fix will be uploaded to
testing-proposed-update... which won't go through unstable for wide
testing.
Franklin
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Meredith wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> OK, thanks.
>
> I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs of
> severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for the
> "important" ones) in order for inclusion in lenny, or also lesser
> severities too ?
As far as I can tell, unstable continues as normal. However, nothing
that is uploaded to unstable as of the start of the freeze will be
automatically migrated into testing.
If I understand correctly, uploading a new version to unstable (targeting lenny+1), will prevent you from uploading a minor bug-fix'ed version to unstable. This means that Lenny bug-fix will be uploaded to testing-proposed-update... which won't go through unstable for wide testing.
Franklin
Reply to: