[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian release versioning



This one time, at band camp, Gunnar Wolf said:
> Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:21:30PM +0200]:
> > > lenny+0.5 would logically be 5.5, since it's unlikely that we will
> > > have five stable updates out within 1.5/2=0.75 years, and if we do,
> > > then lenny+0.5 is late.
> > 
> > I'm not sure sure that we want to have a hole in our versioning scheme.
> > Since "lenny+1/2" is just another stable update, let's just number it
> > like a stable update. So we don't end up with users thinking "You
> > released 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5. Where is 5.4 ?"
> 
> 1. The RMs are right
> 
> 2. The DDs decided to trust the RMs.
> 
> 3. There is no number 3.
> 
> 4. Our priorities are our users and Free Software.

+1

<insert flame about number 4>

:)
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran@debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: