Re: Debian release versioning
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:21:30PM +0200]:
> > lenny+0.5 would logically be 5.5, since it's unlikely that we will
> > have five stable updates out within 1.5/2=0.75 years, and if we do,
> > then lenny+0.5 is late.
> I'm not sure sure that we want to have a hole in our versioning scheme.
> Since "lenny+1/2" is just another stable update, let's just number it
> like a stable update. So we don't end up with users thinking "You
> released 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5. Where is 5.4 ?"
1. The RMs are right
2. The DDs decided to trust the RMs.
3. There is no number 3.
4. Our priorities are our users and Free Software.
Gunnar Wolf - firstname.lastname@example.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF