On 11396 March 1977, Raphael Geissert wrote: > What about going the 'b.)' way but define it as a RG (or even RC) with some > other changes to policy (like requiring big data package's source packages > to be arch-indep and not build anything else but the data packages). No, as already written in my mail. -- bye, Joerg > What would you do if your package contains an Emacs major mode? Orphan it. > If you don't use/know Emacs then this: What would you do if your > package contains a perl module? Submit it to this year's obfuscated coding contest.
Description: PGP signature