[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Large data packages in the archive



On 11396 March 1977, Raphael Geissert wrote:

> What about going the 'b.)' way but define it as a RG (or even RC) with some
> other changes to policy (like requiring big data package's source packages
> to be arch-indep and not build anything else but the data packages). 

No, as already written in my mail.

-- 
bye, Joerg
> What would you do if your package contains an Emacs major mode?
Orphan it.
>  If you don't use/know Emacs then this: What would you do if your
>  package contains a perl module?
Submit it to this year's obfuscated coding contest.

Attachment: pgp4T4ZalA9WR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: