[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Large data packages in the archive



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

What about going the 'b.)' way but define it as a RG (or even RC) with some
other changes to policy (like requiring big data package's source packages
to be arch-indep and not build anything else but the data packages). 

That way the transition could be done gradually for lenny+1 so there's no
bloating.

And, mirror admins could then have plenty of time to decide whether to
mirror the data packages or not.

I believe the key point here is doing it gradually.

What do people think?

Cheers,
Raphael.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIOcVeYy49rUbZzloRAjJlAJ9uFLKRdhPn0FH//nxaGx5MGg0NYACeIb6t
M14wTyfCSWKv60Dkk9z4IXo=
=bsfM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: