Re: Large data packages in the archive
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
What about going the 'b.)' way but define it as a RG (or even RC) with some
other changes to policy (like requiring big data package's source packages
to be arch-indep and not build anything else but the data packages).
That way the transition could be done gradually for lenny+1 so there's no
And, mirror admins could then have plenty of time to decide whether to
mirror the data packages or not.
I believe the key point here is doing it gradually.
What do people think?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----