Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
From: David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 15:34:22 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080525153422.08c26293@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] d46a3c4a0805250540n244cc680nd2297a1fdfde7956@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080525124622.GA13403@connexer.com> <[🔎] d46a3c4a0805250607n3880f76dp41452caa59b7a77e@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 1211721465.23733.16.camel@holly.codehelp> <[🔎] 483969D4.7030808@cox.net>

On Sun, 25 May 2008 08:29:56 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:

> What's an extra few MB plus parsing overhead when "everyone" has
> 250GB HDDs, multi-core 64-bit CPUs and 2+GB RAM?

Well, and what about !i386, !amd64 and !powerpc ? ;)

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

References:
- What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
  - From: "Fernando Cerezal" <kryptos21@gmail.com>
- Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
  - From: Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com>
- Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
  - From: "Fernando Cerezal" <kryptos21@gmail.com>
- Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
  - From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>

Prev by Date: Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
Next by Date: Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
Previous by thread: Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
Next by thread: Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread