On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 14:01 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 13:19 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > > > So I am running the relevant autotools at build time but I still get the > > > warning. > > > > If you run autotools at build time you should also ensure that the > > changes which autotools makes are reverted in the clean target. This > > means that your diff doesn't get cluttered with automatically generated > > things and ensures that repeated builds of the package produce the same > > diff.gz. > > I haven't seen any other packages doing that - is there an example > involving aclocal.m4 somewhere? Actually, I just converted the package to CDBS and it did TheRightThing(tm) so I'll either stick with that or convert what cdbs does into the existing package. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part