*To*: Ondrej Certik <ondrej@certik.cz>*Cc*: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org*Subject*: Re: SAGE packages for Debian*From*: Timothy G Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>*Date*: Fri, 23 May 2008 21:04:18 -0400 (EDT)*Message-id*: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64L.0805161503340.24192@zygorthian-space-raiders.mit.edu>*In-reply-to*: <[🔎] 85b5c3130805141612l3a490849mc490816a3a27d678@mail.gmail.com>*References*: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64L.0805051531290.29984@vinegar-pot.mit.edu> <[🔎] 20080507083910.GB11027@kos.to> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64L.0805071541150.4663@mega-man.mit.edu> <[🔎] 85b5c3130805141612l3a490849mc490816a3a27d678@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 15 May 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Timothy G Abbott <tabbott@mit.edu> wrote:That's probably a good plan, especially since the sandbox is apparently going to be eliminated eventually (and it sounds like arpack and delaunay are on the list of things likely to be merged into mainline scipy) <http://jarrodmillman.blogspot.com/2007/12/end-of-scipy-sandbox.html> I'll send the python-scipy maintainers a note and see what they think.Is Sage really depending on the sandbox? I think it's not a good idea to depend on something that is just a sandbox. :)

-Tim Abbott

**References**:**SAGE packages for Debian***From:*Timothy G Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>

**Re: SAGE packages for Debian***From:*Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>

**Re: SAGE packages for Debian***From:*Timothy G Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>

**Re: SAGE packages for Debian***From:*"Ondrej Certik" <ondrej@certik.cz>

- Prev by Date:
**Bug#482622: ITP: octave-msh -- Package for creating and managing triangular and tetrahedral meshes for Finite Element or Finite Volume PDE solvers.** - Next by Date:
**Patch peer review.** - Previous by thread:
**Re: SAGE packages for Debian** - Next by thread:
**Re: SAGE packages for Debian** - Index(es):