Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
Ben Finney <email@example.com> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> The proposal is about tracking the required patches in the BTS.
Should have said tracking the state of patches. Didn't mean the
> No, the bug is about classifying "divergence from upstream" as a bug
> to be tracked in the Debian BTS. The location of patches isn't a
> necessary part of the proposal.
> Patches in the BTS are listed in the proposal as a "can", not a
> "should" -- i.e. something that would be a natural part of the
> workflow, but not a necessary part of the proposal.