Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field
Bernd Eckenfels <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> In article <[🔎] email@example.com> you wrote:
> > When such bugs are filed, I would ask that they not refer to
> > "headers" which is a term that doesn't apply to 'debian/control'.
> > The contents of 'debian/control' is a set of *fields*, not
> > headers, just like the fields in the header of an email message.
> Are we making new packaging policy here?
No. It's a request for correct terminology. Hopefully it doesn't need
policy rules to enforce.
\ "That's all very good in practice, but how does it work in |
`\ *theory*?" -- Anonymous |