[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field

Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> writes:

> In article <[🔎] 87zlqom0oz.fsf@benfinney.id.au> you wrote:
> > When such bugs are filed, I would ask that they not refer to
> > "headers" which is a term that doesn't apply to 'debian/control'.
> > The contents of 'debian/control' is a set of *fields*, not
> > headers, just like the fields in the header of an email message.
> Are we making new packaging policy here?

No. It's a request for correct terminology. Hopefully it doesn't need
policy rules to enforce.

 \          "That's all very good in practice, but how does it work in |
  `\                                          *theory*?"  -- Anonymous |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Reply to: