Re: divergence from upstream as a bug
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:08:06PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:01:08PM +0000, Joey Hess wrote:
> > What if we just decide that changes made to upstream sources[1] qualify
> > as a bug?
>
> WTF ? What's the point of free software if we invent rules for not
> modifying them ? And well, we're in a bad posture then, because glibc
> without patches can't work. Striving for minimal differences is good,
> but deciding a change is a bug ? please…
You should read after the first sentence.
Mike
Reply to: