Re: intend to hijack GnuPG

[Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>]

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:37:57PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:

> gnupg is important package. PTS says:
> "The package is of priority standard or higher, you should really find some 
> co-maintainers."

> Suggestion: Can we replace 'should' with 'must'?

Wrong problem - we don't need more maintainers for packages, we need
responsive maintainers who stay on top of things.  Chances are that
anything you can enforce automatically probably isn't going to deal
with that problem.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."