[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Rejected: epcr_2.3.9-1.dsc: sha1 check failed

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 02:25:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Thibaut Paumard <paumard@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > Le 17 avr. 08 à 13:04, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> >> IMO, that sort of misses the point.  While I maintain quite a few
> >> packages in Debian, the only places I run unstable/testing are in
> >> one VM
> >> (for testing/reproducing/fixing bugs that I cannot reproduce in
> >> stable)
> >> and in some chroots.  The point is that I should be able to build my
> >> packages inside of a pbuilder or other type of chroot, sign the
> >> package
> >> on my host system and be reasonably sure that my package will be
> >> accepted into the archive.  If the archive software breaks
> >> compatibility
> >> with the current stable release of (insert name of whatever tool is
> >> affected, specifically devscripts in this case), then it looks bad on
> >> Debian.
> >
> > The problem is the same with lintian, that you need to backport
> > regularly. (Lintian being arch:all, of course, that's much easier).
> You do not need lintian to upload a package. You do have to sign.
Additionally, running lintian inside the chroot is trivial and does not
require transporting the GPG key into the chroot.



Roberto C. Sánchez

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: