Re: s390 buildd?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen <email@example.com> writes:
> > [Steve Langasek]
> >> The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as
> >> 'Not-for-us' if he doesn't feel like building them for the arch,
> >> without bothering to reach a consensus first together with the
> >> maintainer, the ftp masters, or the maintainers of the P-a-s
> >> overrides.
> > Is the unilateral flagging of not-for-us being addressed in any way?
> Similar the ia64 buildd admin, see #464932. Or is there anything I could
> do myself about this?
That package is only n-f-u on s390, it's in p-a-s for some other
architectures. It seems to indeed FTBFS on a couple of architectures,
so why do you think the p-a-s is wrong?