Re: s390 buildd?
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen <email@example.com> writes:
>> [Steve Langasek]
>>> The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as
>>> 'Not-for-us' if he doesn't feel like building them for the arch,
>>> without bothering to reach a consensus first together with the
>>> maintainer, the ftp masters, or the maintainers of the P-a-s
>> Is the unilateral flagging of not-for-us being addressed in any way?
> Similar the ia64 buildd admin, see #464932. Or is there anything I could
> do myself about this?
Hmm, you do realise that lcd4linux is mentioned in P-a-s because it
includes sys/io.h, right? So this is not similar at all...