Re: s390 buildd?
Petter Reinholdtsen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> [Steve Langasek]
>> The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as
>> 'Not-for-us' if he doesn't feel like building them for the arch,
>> without bothering to reach a consensus first together with the
>> maintainer, the ftp masters, or the maintainers of the P-a-s
> Is the unilateral flagging of not-for-us being addressed in any way?
Similar the ia64 buildd admin, see #464932. Or is there anything I could
do myself about this?
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4