Re: dpkg semi-hijack - an announcement (also, triggers)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 01:19:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> And most importantly, you wouldn't contemplate deploying somewhere else an
> implementation of triggers that hasn't been accepted in dpkg, because of the
> danger of creating (and maintaining) a sustained incompatibility.
Oh wait, I see that you already did. This can be real fun...
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)