Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's
Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> writes:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
>> (also, linitan.d.o seems down at the moment, but that's another issue).
> That's because lintian.d.o's lintian package was upgraded and the archive
> (i386+source) is being checked.
And also I screwed up something with the new version of lintian and
there's a bug in the harness script that caused it to blow away the old
web pages. But it should be fixed in a few (up to ch in reverse
alphabetical order).
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: