On 13/02/2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > The architecture for which a DD is initially uploading a package is > already lacking a build log on buildd.debian.org and the > corresponding build has no guarantee to be reproducible. > > So if these are good arguments for not doing (massive) binary > uploads, they are also good arguments for not allowing > binary-uploads at all (thousands DDs making binary uploads are > hardly worst than 1 DD doing massive binary uploads). Or, if you > prefer, they are good arguments for throwing away the .debs uploaded > by DDs and rebuilding them from scratch. > > SCNR, really. I just made the same remark to Raphaël on IRC, thanks for summing it up here. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpESe4CbtyxC.pgp
Description: PGP signature