Re: [email@example.com: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes]
On 2008-02-11, Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:13:21PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>> Luk Claes wrote:
>> > It was rejected with the following message:
>> > Rejected: ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes: Missing mandatory field `description'.
>> Hm, looks like mergechanges is to blame.
>> > You should have got a REJECTED mail telling you btw.
>> I never got a REJECTED mail.
> Right; if dak can't parse the .changes file, how should it know where to
> send a mail?
The Maintainer and Changed-By fields were perfectly parseable...